RESULTS OF THE PHARMACOECONOMIC STUDY OF MEDICAL CARE FOR END-STAGE RENAL FAILURE PATIENTS IN NEED OF DIALYSIS
Abstract
Budget impact analysis and cost-utility analysis for the therapy of end-stage renal failure by methods of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis were performed by means of a developed analytical model of decision making. Effect of impact on the budget of extension of the peritoneal dialysis program was defined. Budget impact analysis has shown that the use of peritoneal dialysis as first-line therapy for patients with end-stage renal failure is accompanied by savings of the federal budget. It has also been found that peritoneal dialysis as compared to hemodialysis is characterized as a dominant point of view of the analysis «cost-utility», having a smaller value of the coefficient «cost-utility».
About the Authors
G. T. Abdrashitova
Laboratory of pharmacoeconomic researches Scientific Research Institute of Pharmacy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
R. S. Skulkova
Russian center «Farmedinfo» of the Russian Federation Ministry of Health
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. А.В. Смирнов и др. Национальные рекомендации. Хроническая болезнь почек: основные принципы скрининга, диагностики, профилактики и подходы к лечению // Нефрология. 2012. Т. 16. №. 1. С. 89-115.
2. T. Liyanage et al. Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review // The Lancet. 2015. V. 385. №. 9981. P. 1975-1982.
3. Б.Т. Бикбов, Н.А. Томилина. Заместительная терапия больных с хронической почечной недостаточностью в Российской Федерации в 1998-2013 гг. // Нефрология и диализ. 2015. Т. 17. № 3. С. 5-107.
4. B. Rutkowski. Highlights of the epidemiology of renal replacement therapy in Central and Eastern Europe // Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2006. V. 21. P. 4-10.
5. Государственный реестр зарегистрированных цен на препараты ЖНВЛП. URL: www.grls.rosminzdrav. ru (дата обращения 24.12.2015).
6. Поиск лекарственных препаратов в России. URL: http://aptechka.ru/ (дата обращения 24.12.2015).
7. Р.И. Ягудина, В.Г. Серпик, И.В. Сороковиков. Методологические основы анализа «затраты - эффективность» // Фармакоэкономика: теория и практика. 2014. Т. 2. № 2. С. 23-26.
8. Р.И. Ягудина, В.Г. Серпик, Д.Т. Угрехелидзе. Методологические основы анализа «влияния на бюджет» // Фармакоэкономика: теория и практика. 2015. Т. 3. № 4. С. 5-8.
9. K. Sennfalt, М. Magnusson, Р. Carlsson. Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis - a cost-utility analysis // Peritoneal Dialysis International. 2002. V. 22. №. 1. P. 39-47.
10. M. Julius et al. A comparison of employment rates of patients treated with continuous ambulatory peri- toneal dialysis vs in-center hemodialysis (Michigan End-Stage Renal Disease Study) //Archives of internal medicine. 1989. V. 149. №. 4. P. 839-842.
11. US. Renal Data System. USRDS 2011 Annual data Report: Atlas of end-stage renal disease in the Unites States. 2011.
12. L. A. Orlando et al. The chronic kidney disease model: a general purpose model of disease progression and treatment // BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2011. V. 11. №. 1. P. 41.
13. A.H. Zhang et al. Comparison of quality of life and causes of hospitalization between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients in China // Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007. V. 5. №. 1. P. 49.
14. A.T. Hauch, P.W. Lundberg, A.S. Paramesh. Laparoscopic Techniques Enable Peritoneal Dialysis in the Difficult Abdomen // JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 2014. V. 18. P. 4.
15. C.A. Restrepo, C.A. Buitrago, C. Holguin. Implantation of peritoneal catheters by laparotomy: nephrologists obtained similar results to general surgeons // International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease. 2014. V. 7. P. 383.
16. A.K. Al-Hwiesh et al. Percutaneous versus laparoscopic placement of peritoneal dialysis catheters: Simplicity and favorable outcome // Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation. 2014. V. 25. №. 6. P. 1194.
17. C.J. Ouyang et al. Comparing the incidence of catheter-related complications with straight and coiled tenckhoff catheters in peritoneal dialysis patients - a single-center prospective randomized trial // Peritoneal Dialysis International. 2015. V. 35. №. 4. P. 443-449.
18. R.J. Barone et al. Peritoneal Dialysis as a First versus Second Option after Previous Haemodialysis: A Very Long-Term Assessment // International journal of nephrology. 2014.
19. Приказ от 20 декабря 2012 г. № 1268н «Об утверждении стандарта специализированной медицинской помощи при хронической болезни почек 5 стадии в преддиализном периоде, при госпитализации с целью подготовки к заместительной почечной терапии».
20. Пенсионный фонд Российской Федерации. URL: www.pfrf.ru (дата обращения 24.03.2016).
21. Федеральная служба государственной статистики. URL: http://www.gks.ru/ (дата обращения 24.03.2016).
Review
For citations:
Abdrashitova G.T., Skulkova R.S. RESULTS OF THE PHARMACOECONOMIC STUDY OF MEDICAL CARE FOR END-STAGE RENAL FAILURE PATIENTS IN NEED OF DIALYSIS. Drug development & registration. 2016;(2):188-194. (In Russ.)
Views:
603
Email this article 