Preview

Drug development & registration

Advanced search

Evolution of clinical trials: a comprehensive analysis of ICH E6(R3) and integrated quality management systems in the pharmaceutical industry

https://doi.org/10.33380/2305-2066-2026-15-2-2191

Abstract

Introduction. In the context of digital transformation and global harmonization of regulatory requirements, the implementation of integrated quality management systems in clinical trials based on ICH E6(R3) has become increasingly relevant.

Aim. To conduct a comparative analysis of ICH E6(R3) against international standards (ISO, GAMP 5, PMBOK/APM-BOK) and assess their adaptability within the Russian regulatory environment.

Materials and methods. A systematic analysis was performed of the Russian regulatory framework – including Federal Law No. 61-FZ of April 12, 2010; Decision No. 79 of the Eurasian Economic Commission Council of November 3, 2016, approving the Good Clinical Practice Rules of the Eurasian Economic Union; and GOST R 52379-2005 "Good Clinical Practice" – as well as international guidelines (ICH, ISO, EMA, PMI, ISPE) and scientific publications from 2020 to 2025 indexed in Scopus and Web of Science.

Results and discussion. It was established that ICH E6(R3) necessitates a shift from reactive oversight to proactive quality management through the integration of risk-based approaches, digital technologies, and interdisciplinary standards. Within the Russian context, gaps in regulatory provisions and insufficient integration of quality management systems were identified.

Conclusion. To align with ICH E6(R3), Russian regulatory authorities and organizations must modernize internal processes, implement Risk-Based Quality Management (RBQM), and harmonize national requirements with international standards.

About the Authors

M. M. Kamkha
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991



B. Y. Margaeva
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991



N. A. Babicheva
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991



S. E. Ulyanova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow, 119991



References

1. Bhatt A. The revamped Good Clinical Practice E6(R3) guideline: profound changes in principles and practice. Perspectives in Clinical Research. 2023;14(4):167–171. DOI: 10.4103/picr.picr_184_23.

2. Dirks A., Florez M., Torche F., Young S., Slizgi B., Getz K. Comprehensive assessment of risk-based quality management adoption in clinical trials. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 2024;58:520–527. DOI: 10.1007/s43441-024-00618-5.

3. Stansbury N., Branco D., McDavid C., Stewart J., Surdam K., Olson N., Perry J., Liska J., Phillips L., Coogan A., Adelfio A., Garson L. Risk-based Quality Management: a case for centralized monitoring. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 2025;59(1):199–210. DOI: 10.1007/s43441-024-00719-1.

4. Franchina V., Stabile S., Cenna R., Mannozzi F., Federici I., Testoni S., Sinno V., Cagnazzo C. ISO 9001:2015 standard implementation in clinical trial centers: An exploratory analysis of benefits and barriers in Italy. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 2023;33:101104. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101104.

5. Florez M., Dirks A., Sullivan L., Young S., Getz K. Adoption Maturity Model for Risk-based Quality Management (RBQM) in Clinical Trials. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 2025;59:549–557. DOI: 10.1007/s43441-025-00746-6.

6. Farrell B., Kenyon S., Shakur H. Managing clinical trials. Trials. 2010;11:78. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-78.

7. Morrison B., et al. Quality by Design in clinical trials: pilot with FDA. Therapeutic Innovation and Regulatory Science. 2015;49(5):665–673.

8. Pedro F., Veiga F., Mascarenhas-Melo F. Impact of GAMP 5, data integrity and QbD on quality assurance in the pharmaceutical industry: How obvious is it? Drug Discovery Today. 2023;28(11):103759. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2023.103759.

9. Aaberg C., Dahmen H., Davies C., Sandau P. L., Srinivasan R. ISO 9001:2015 Versus ICH Q10 – A Comparison. PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology. 2021;75(2):188–206. DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2020.011692.

10. Minetti M., Topole E., Rondinone I., et al. Patient-centric and decentralized clinical trials in rare diseases. PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology. 2025. (In press.)

11. Fneish F., Schaarschmidt F., Fortwengel G. Improving Risk Assessment in Clinical Trials: Toward a Systematic Risk-Based Monitoring Approach. Current Therapeutic Research. 2021;95:100643. DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2021.100643.

12. Kandi V., Vadakedath S., Addanki P. S., Godishala V., Pinnelli V. B. Clinical trials: The role of regulatory agencies, pharmacovigilance laws, guidelines, risk management, patenting, and publicizing results. Borneo Journal of Pharmacy. 2023;6(1):93–109. DOI: 10.33085/bjop. v6i1.3806.

13. Barnes B., Stansbury N., Brown D., Garson L., Gerard G., Piccoli N., Jendrasek D., May N., Castillo V., Adelfio A., Ramirez N., McSweeney A., Berlien R., Butler P. J. Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Past, Present, and Future. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science. 2021;55:899–906. DOI: 10.1007/s43441-021-00295-8.

14. Ravikumar P., Prasad S. N. Computer System Validation and Data Integrity in GxP Environments. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2023;18:345–360. DOI: 10.1007/s12247-023-09671-0.

15. Brulotte M., Alvey J. S., Casper T. C., Cook L. J., Dwyer J. P., VanBuren J. M. A risk-based monitoring approach to source data monitoring and documenting monitoring findings. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2024;143:107581. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107581.


Supplementary files

1. Графический абстракт
Subject
Type Исследовательские инструменты
View (829KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾

Review

For citations:


Kamkha M.M., Margaeva B.Y., Babicheva N.A., Ulyanova S.E. Evolution of clinical trials: a comprehensive analysis of ICH E6(R3) and integrated quality management systems in the pharmaceutical industry. Drug development & registration. 2026;15(2):112-124. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33380/2305-2066-2026-15-2-2191

Views: 1347

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2305-2066 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5049 (Online)