Preview

Drug development & registration

Advanced search

INVESTIGATION OF ROBUSTNESS AT VALIDATION OF HPLC AND UPLC METHODS: A MODERN APPROACH INCLUDING RISK ANALYSIS

Abstract

A new approach to the robustness investigation of HPLC/UPLC methods that includes use of risk analysis is offered. It allows reliable justification of the choice as well as omission of certain factors at study of the robustness of HPLC/UPLC methods. The risk level of factors is determined using a special matrix and a table to assess the сriticality of the factor and the рrobability of its critical impact on responses. It is emphasized that the exclusion of any factor associated with the chromatographic system from investigation of robustness at validation of a concrete method has to be reliably justified - with the use of a risk analysis including consideration of the features of chromatograms and theoretical arguments. For the factors that often have the high and average level of risk, we provide and discuss the guide values for the limits of the factor change based on our own experience and literary data. We also suggest the guide values for permissible limits of the responses variation as well as an example of assessment of robustness of the method for determining impurities using risk analysis and «оne-factor-at-a-time» method. Recommendations are made to study of the robustness of HPLC/UPLC methods.

About the Authors

N. A. Epshtein
Autonomous Incorporation «STADA PharmDevelopment», SC «NIZHPHARM»
Russian Federation


V. L. Sevastianova
Autonomous Incorporation «STADA PharmDevelopment», SC «NIZHPHARM»
Russian Federation


A. I. Koroleva
Autonomous Incorporation «STADA PharmDevelopment», SC «NIZHPHARM»
Russian Federation


References

1. United States Pharmacopoeia. USP40-NF35. 2017.

2. Государственная фармакопея Российской Федерации. XIII издание. Т. 1. - М. 2015.

3. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R1). - ICH. 2005.

4. Й. Эрмер., Д.Х. Мак, Б. Миллер. Валидация методик в фармацевтическом анализе. Примеры наилучших практик. - М.: ВИАЛЕК, 2013. 495 с. // Method Validation in Pharmaceutical Analysis. A Guide to Best Practice / Ed. by J. Remer, J.H. Mac, B. Miller. - Wenham: Wiley-VT Verlag GmbH & Co. Ka, 2005. 403 p.

5. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline. Quality risk management. Q9. - ICH. 2005.

6. Y. Vander Heyden, A. Nijhuis, J. Smeyers-Verbeke et al. Guidance for Robustness/Ruggedness Tests in Method Validation // J. Pharm. and Biomed. Analysis. 2001. V. 24, № 5-6. P. 723-753.

7. E. Hund, Y. Vander Heyden, D. L. Massart, J. Smeyers-Verbeke, Derivation of system suitability test limits from a robustness test on an LC assay with complex antibiotic samples // J. Pharm. and Biomed. Analysis. 2002. V. 30. P. 1197-1206.

8. B. Dejaegher, Y. Vander Heyden. Ruggedness and robustness testing // J. Chromatography A. 2007. V. 1158. P. 138-157.

9. E. Hund, Y. Vander Heyden, M. Haustein et al. Comparison of several criteria to decide on the significance of effects in a robustness test with an asymmetrical factorial design // Analytica Chimica Acta. 2000. V. 404. P. 257-271.

10. ГОСТ Р 51901.12-2007 (МЭК 60812:2006). Менеджмент риска. Метод анализа видов и последствий отказов. - М.: Стандартинформ, 2008 (IEC 60812:2066. Analysis techniques for system reliability - Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) (MOD)). URL: http://www.novsu.ru/file/1202523 (дата обращения 10.12.2017).

11. ГОСТ Р ИСО/МЭК 31010-2011. Методы оценки рисков. - М.: Стандартинформ, 2008 (ISO/IEC 31010:2009. Risk management - Risk assessment techniques. (IDT)). URL: http://ivan-shamaev.ru/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/31010-2011_Russia.pdf (дата обращения 10.12.2017).

12. Waters e2695 Separations Modules. - Waters. 2008. URL: http://www.waters.com/webassets/cms/library/docs/720002552en.pdf (дата обращения 10.12.2017).

13. European Pharmacopoeia, 9th ed. Chapter 2.2.46. Chromatographic separation techniques. 2017.

14. J.A. Illingworth. A common source of error in pH measurement // Biochem. J. 1981. V. 195. P. 259-262.

15. Application Bulletin 188/3 e pH measurement technique. Metrohm. URL: http://www.mep.net.au/wpmep/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/MEP_693384_AB-188_3_EN.pdf (дата обращения 10.12.2017).

16. B. Patel, S. Roy, H. Ghelani, S. Parmar. Development & Validation of RP-HPLC Method for Estimation of Dabigatran Etexilate Mesylate from Capsule Dosage Form // Intern. J. Pharma Sciences and Research. 2017. V. 8. № 6. P. 142-151.

17. Agilent 1200 Series Specification.- Agilent Technologies. 2006. URL: http://photos.labwrench.com/equipmentManuals/6933-2432.pdf (дата обращения 10.12.2017).

18. Н.А. Эпштейн. О стрессовых экспериментах при разработке / усовершенствовании аналитических методик и технологий лекарственных субстанций и препаратов // Разработка и регистрация лекарственных средств. 2016. Т. 3. № 16. С. 54-68.

19. Н.А. Эпштейн. О допустимых значениях порога игнорирования примесей и отношения сигнал/шум при проверке чувствительности хроматографической системы // Ведомости НЦЭСМП. 2017. Т. 7. № 2. С. 85-91.

20. V. Kalyana Chakravarthy, G. Kishore Babu, R. Lakshmana Dasu et al. The role of relative response factor in related substances method development by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) // Rasayan J. Chem. 2011. V. 4. № 4. P. 919-943. URL: http://www.rasayanjournal.co.in/vol-4/issue-4/37.pdf (дата обращения 10.12.2017).

21. Technical Guide for the Elaboration of Monographs. 7th Еd. EDQM. European Pharmacopoeia. 2015. P. 30-32. URL: https://www.edqm.eu/sites/default/files/technical._guide_for_the_elaboration_of_monographs_7th_edition_2015.pdf (дата обращения 10.12.2017).

22. А.И. Гризодуб, Д.А. Леонтьев, Н.В. Денисенко, Ю.В. Подпружников. Стандартизованная процедура валидации методик количественного анализа лекарственных средств методом стандарта // Фармаком. 2004. № 3. C. 1-15.

23. А.И. Гризодуб. Стандартизованные процедуры валидации методик контроля качества лекарственных средств. - Харьков: Украинский научный фармакопейный центр контроля качества лекарственных средств, 2016. С. 47.

24. M.I. Jimidar, P. Heylen, M. De Smet. Method Validation // Separation Science and Technology. 2007. V. 8. P. 441-458.

25. П.С. Садек. Как избежать ошибок в высокоэффективной жидкостной хроматографии. Лабораторное пособие / Пер. с англ. И. Дубинского. - М. 2010. (Перевод книги Paul C. Sadek. Troubleshooting HPLC Systems: A Bench Manual, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 1999).


Review

For citations:


Epshtein N.A., Sevastianova V.L., Koroleva A.I. INVESTIGATION OF ROBUSTNESS AT VALIDATION OF HPLC AND UPLC METHODS: A MODERN APPROACH INCLUDING RISK ANALYSIS. Drug development & registration. 2018;(1):96-109. (In Russ.)

Views: 2014


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2305-2066 (Print)
ISSN 2658-5049 (Online)